| 
   Ting Tong PangHi this is Uncle Jeebers and I've been a professional translator of Chinese since 2001.
 
 The sounds in Chinese don't 
really matter. That's not the important part of the Chinese language. 
Western languages tend to be aurally arranged, i.e., they use very 
simple visual parts to describe complex sound combinations. Chinese is 
the opposite in that they use very simple audio parts to describe 
complex visual phenomenon. This is because the Chinese personality is 
visually formalist.
 
 Concerning beauty, I think we can come up with a very easy 
generalization. Italian is the most beautiful/culturally powerful 
language to listen to, but it is ugly as forms on paper. Chinese is the 
most beautiful/culturally powerful language to read, but it is ugly as 
sounds to listen to.
 
 Italian is designed to sound good. Classical Latin does not sound as 
good as Italian. Italian eliminates different hard sounds being used 
together, like the /ks/ in express turns to /ss/ in espresso and in 
general reduces consonant mixing like fluid is fiume (river) and flame 
is fiamme (flame), glacial is giaccia (ice) and even etcetera is 
eccetera (pronounced ech-et-er-a). Another point is that italian 
maintains the pure five vowels and there is no "shortening" or lazy 
vowels allowed. I think lazy vowels in Hindi, English and German are 
ugly and generally lazy, like uh eh ih. But in italian you have long 
strings of fluid consonants with pure vowels. And thirdly, italian 
maintains longer words. The longer a word to pronounce, the easier it is
 for the speaker to find a beautiful, round way to say it. Length is 
your friend when you're trying to do something.
 
 So in the end, Italian is recognized in music as the most beautiful 
language. Italian is the most popular language used for opera. Italian 
is the standard language used for musical manuscripts - allegro non 
troppo, adagio, etc.
 
 Other latin languages come close to this standard. Portuguese and 
Spanish are also very beautiful and heavily used in lyrics and music. 
And we notice that latin societies are obsessed with music, song, 
lyrics...
 
 If you take everything I said about italian and reverse it, you're 
talking about Chinese. Chinese is visually beautiful because there are a
 lot of strokes given to you to draw your beautiful picture in the 
little box. This is one aspect of it. There are also grammatical rules 
to drawing pictures, how one picture element changes if it is used in 
another character, but is fuller if it is on its own, like water 水 turns
 to three dots (impossible to draw in a letter here, but, something like
 the character for three 三), so the character for flow is 流 and you see 
the three dots on the left there indicating it deals with water, and you
 see another three lines flowing vertically out the bottom of the 
character to describe river etc.
 
 The power in Chinese language on paper then translates into it being the
 preferred language for any major cultural Asian event. For karate 
uniforms, no director seeking to impress his students with his Asian 
culture would smatter latin letters across the uniforms or across the 
sign above his door. Westerners crave Chinese tattoos, even though they 
have no idea what they mean, because they apparently look better than 
long, visually incoherent strings of latin script. Even Koreans, 
Japanese and other asians feel compelled to study them and use them in 
cultural contexts. Traditional Chinese characters simply have the most 
powerful visual force in language in the world today.
 
 However you notice that even with the disgusting play and film Madamme 
Butterfly, Chinese opera has not caught on in the west AT ALL. The sound
 of it is horrid, piercing and nasal, like animals crying out for their 
lives. Visually the masks, costumes and acrobatics that it includes are 
popular. Again, Chinese have mastered something visual, but cannot make 
something aural work.
 
 We can't have a language that works on all levels at once. You can't put
 grammar everywhere. Italians can use grammar to make words match (or 
not, depending on meaning) and flow better, but they can't ALSO make the
 latin letters make a better composition on paper AS WELL. This 
fundamental contradiction means a language can only be visually or 
aurally based, but not both at the same time.
 
 Finally, the idea that Chinese sounds like silverware clanging is a sort
 of joke that doesn't make sense to Chinese or myself. It makes sense in
 that clanging is a short sound. But most of the Chinese language is 
composed of words that are not like ting tong kang pang etc. The most 
often used syllables are: Zhi (like the -ger in badger) shi (like "sure"
 or the sure in "composure") and Yi (like the letter E). There are 
literally thousands of words pronounced with this sounds, and they make 
up most of the language. As you might guess, actually ping pang etc. are
 ottomotopeia words. Ping-pong is simply describing the sound of the 
balls going back and forth, and the characters visually show that: 乒乓. 
(these are two syllables and pronounced exactly like the English 
borrowed word ping pong). I would more describe the Chinese language on 
an audio level as being "digital". It sounds like a very short, logical 
code not too far from morse code.
 
 *****The KBH*****
 
 | Home About
 FAQ
 Contact
 Blog
 
 Who We Is
 How to Join
 
 KBH original Articles:
 
 Drugs vs. Prayer
 
 Man vs. Woman
 
 Porn Slave Epitaph
 
 Spiderwoman
 
 Killed by Their
                      Woman
 
 Becoming a Cow
 
 The Mythopoetic Men's Movement
 
 New Menation Cult proposed
 
 China vs. India
 
 Prudes are the Real Sexperts
 
 Teeterin on TC?
 
 Go Hang a Salami, I'm a
                      Lasagna Hog!
 
 Thoughts on Kids
 
 How Faggy is Bodybuildin?
 
 Macho Murder?
 
 Cut-up Karma
 
 How to Keep Your Stallion in
                      His Stall
 
 Health of Nations
 
 How to Talk Hick
 
 Re: Forums
 
 Sex is Not Enjoyable
 
 The End of Mankind
 
 A Discussion Between Dr.
                      Rob and Uncle Jeebers
 
 Why Intoxicants Cause
                      Spiritual Harm
 
 KBH resources:
 
 Pilgrimage List
 Celibates List
 Animals
 Positive Lyrics
 ॐ The Gospel of the Holy Twelve ॐ
 Misogyny
 
 External Links:
 
 celibacy.info
 atmajyoti.org
 semenloss.info
 Srila
                      Prabhupada
 TrueKabbalah.org
 kkklan.com
 7th Day Adventism
 
 Try out the KBH lifestyle:
 Forest of
                      Peace
 
 Clean comedy:
 Brian
                      Regan [1]
                    [2]
                    [3]
 
 More articles:
 
 Hair and the Yogi
 
 How
Virility
                      is Destroyed
 
 Defiant
                      Chastity
 
 We
                      Believe in Being Chaste [LDS link]
 
 Statement
                      on the Environment [7th Day Adventist link]
 
 The Successful Politician
                      Does Not Drink by George Washington Plunkitt
 
 Who Built the Moon?
 website
                    and book
 
 Website
                    against vastectomy which gives clues as to how left-hand
                      tantrists get sick
 
 The crazy Talmud
 
 What's up with Dinosaurs and Dragons? video
                    by Kent Hovind
 
 The Nephilim:
                    the Sons of God
 
 Giants
                    by Steve Quale: proofs
 
 From
                      Crisis to Peace: How vegetarianism can save
                    the world
 
 
 Semen Loss as cause of disease: 1800's French
                      European physician article 
 
Swami Sivananda: The Horror of Semen Loss articlePreservation of Vital Fluid: Sikh articleThe Dangers of Mouth Breathing: pdf
                      articleNatural Health Videos 
                      By Magnus Muller
 Mormons  against self-abuse:
 article
                      1
 article
                      2
 
 Uncle Jeebers:
 Against MGM
 Porn Propaganda Debunked
 
 
 Spitual Warfare: pdf
                      article
 
 |